Cloverfield: Something Else, Also Terrible
Against all odds - and really most of recorded history - Australia got a film before anyone else. Namely Cloverfield, which I was excited to see a) because it’s JJ Abrams and LOST is still kind of awesome and b) it’s fodder for my post-9/11 disaster movies PhD, which is totally impractical but is still a fervent dream. The Statue of Liberty gets blown up and NYC gets a pummeling. Great stuff.
And, unfortunately, I’m going to give it what I imagine must be the worst kind of review in Abrams’ mind: meh.
It had some interesting elements, but was dragged down by incredibly stilted dialogue (shame on you, Drew Goddard, you’ve done some great stuff) and just a general inability to build interest in the characters. Luckily, they don’t seem that interested in each other either, so that works out. The direction is uninspired - the filmwork is jarring but good - Matt Reeves is a TV director and it shows.
Cloverfield’s major redeeming factor is the line I’ve quoted in the title. I think I laughed for nearly a minute on that one. That’s the Drew we know and love. But! One line does not a disaster movie make. I will give Abrams credit for not pulling his punches, though; he deals out the death not just the destruction.
So, it wasn’t awful, but it wasn’t particularly interesting either. And at only 75 minutes long, my $15 ticket is all the more upsetting. And I’m now convinced that Abrams has no idea how he’s going to wrap up LOST. I think he just likes weird and inexplicable.
So then we snuck into Juno. People who approximate my taste in films all gave glowing reviews of this film, but again I was unwowed. If I had to come up with a one sentence review, it’d be: ‘Wow, teens sure have a whole lot of funny words’ or ‘Motherhood is rewarding even in the most trying of circumstances, sometimes pretty contrived ones.’
But getting back to Cloverfield, perhaps ’some thing has found us.’ Walking home tonight, something scurried along the path, and I literally cannot tell you what phylum this beastie belonged to. A bug? A rodent? Who he hells knows?
Which brings me to a point I’ll leave for tomorrow - provided I don’t die from the Off I just sprayed all over my bed to keep the mosquitoes away.
Update: Inexplicably, the Age thought Cloverfield was amazing; um, the NYT did not.
Update II: The Chicago Tribune’s Michael Phillips pretty much wrote the exact review I would have - if, you know, I was writing for something other than my own personal amusement (and didn’t have some strange LOST loyalty to Abrams about not wanting to give the monster secrets away. Sad!)
Sphere: Related Content
