Everyone else: ‘Not so much.’
I really hope Clinton realized how ridiculous this sounded as she said it:
Mrs. Clinton, in an appearance before a Hispanic business group in Washington Wednesday morning, argued that the delegates should be seated based on the results of the Michigan and Florida primaries, which were held in January in violation of Democratic Party rules.
…
“The results of those primaries were fair and should be honored,” she told the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce here.
Okay, for those of you who haven’t been following this saga: Florida and Michigan wanted to move their primaries earlier in the year, probably to garner some of the huge amounts of cash that visiting and commercialing politicians leave in their wake.
The DNC told them, ‘don’t do that, or we will strip you of your delegates.’ They did it, and the DNC stripped them of their ability to put up delegates for a candidate at the nominating convention.
Since we were punishing them, all the other (major) candidates removed their names from the Michigan ballot. Except for Clinton. And no one campaigned in Florida. Kind of:
Clinton won after all the Democratic candidates agreed not to campaign in either state because they violated the party rules. Clinton, who flew into Florida on primary eve but did not hold a public rally, tried to argue that Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois had violated the pledge by airing a national ad campaign that also showed on Florida television stations.
Not to mention that this same AP article is mostly about Howard Ickes, now a Clinton campaign delegate counter, arguing that the two states’ delegates should be put back into play. Ickes is one of the DNC members that voted to strip the delegates in the first place.
To be fair, Clinton went on to say yesterday that an alternative to seating the ‘fair’ delegates would be to hold a new primary, probably by mail-in ballot. This is being discussed, but no one seems to think it’ll really work. And is it really fair, they’ve never done a mail-in vote, etc., etc.
Basically, this is really stuffed up. Whether or not Clinton saw this coming months ago - because that Michigan thing is hard to justify - she can’t really think that Obama’s going to say, ‘Oh sure, let’s seat the delegates from a state in which I was not even a choice.’
Clinton won Michigan 55% to ‘Uncommitted’s’ 40% - and you have to assume that many Obama and Edwards supporters just stayed home that day.
Her campaign (and campaign strategy) gets more ludicrous every day. I mean, does no one read these things out loud before talking?
Links:
Clinton and Obama Split Over Florida and Michigan [NYT]
Clinton Aide Changes Mich., Fla. Stance [AP/MyWay]
Fla. Presidential Primary Re-Do Unlikely [AP]
Sphere: Related Content
Vaguely Related