Completely Unnecessary

At least one ward of the Mormon church is activating against Illinois’ HB 2234, which would provide civil unions in the state (h/t Paul). Such unions would be available to hetero and homosexual couples, ad would provide the same rights and responsibilities as marriage.

An email sent around to ward members encouraged them to call state legislators because the bill would, ‘create grounds for rewriting all social mores,’ amongst other evils.

The bill passed out of committee yesterday despite the church’s input.

As they recommend, however, it’s a good idea to call your legislators and express your support for HB 2234.

While you’re at it, also tell them to support HB 2354, the Reproductive Health and Access Act.

The bill mandates that state and sub-governmental agencies cannot deny women contraception or abortions before fetal viability (with an exception for the health of the mother); ensures funding for reproductive health for low-income/medicaid patients; and mandates that public schools provide medically-accurate comprehensive sex ed.

All lovely things.

You can find your state legislators here.

In national news, after Vitter’s amendment to block Title X money to Planned Parenthood, Sen. DeMint offered an amendment that would block a rule re-allowing pharmaceutical companies to provide low-cost birth control to universities and health clinics. DeMint complained it was an ‘earmark’, despite the fact that it offered no money from the federal government, just re-allowed companies to offer cheap bc at their own cost.

The Wicker amendment sought to limit US funding to the UN Population Fund, which provides family planning for women around the world. Republicans continue to argue that the UNPFA provides funds for coercive abortion in China, when even Bush’s own investigators found that it does no such thing. Wicker’s amendment was defeated.

Ugh.

I mean, yay, but ugh that we have to keep having these kind of debates over legal medications and family planning programs that reduce abortions. Hard to argue that pro-life Republicans are really interested in preventing abortions.

In international sad news that really has nothing to do with any of this, Zimbabwean PM Morgan Tsvangirai was injured and his wife killed in a car wreck today.

The truck driver that hit their car (in the middle of a convoy) said he fell asleep whilst driving.

The MDC will investigate independently, especially after their videographer, who rushed to the scene, was arrested and his camera confiscated.

My heart goes out to Tsvangiai, who continues to stand strong after a year of unbelievable tragedy.

Vaguely Related

• Zimbabwe Election Redux
• Today in Lady News

As I mentioned yesterday, turnout is expected to be low for the IL-05 primary, but this is absurd.

I just voted, and, as of 1:30pm (5.5 hours before the polls close), I was the fifth person to vote in my precinct.

If Ward 1 voters aren’t turning out, this election is going to be decided by an extremely small number of people.

If you haven’t voted and are thinking about skipping it - please go out there. There are no lines, so you’ll be in and out.

Think of the voter calculus - I just made sure my candidate got at least 20% of the vote in my precinct (provided no one else votes).

You can diminish my personal power by visiting your polling place. Please do so; it might go to my head.

God, thinking about the amount of money spent on this race for this sort of turnout is sort of appalling.

Thoughts on choosing a ballot - Jeremy might kill me, but if you’re a liberal thinking of pulling a Green ballot, you might want to think twice.

The election for IL-05 will almost certainly be decided by this winner-takes-all Democratic primary.

If you have strong feelings for (or, perhaps more importantly, against) one of the contenders in the Democratic field, you can most effectively wield your vote in the Democratic primary.

You can still vote for the Green in the general, when the Green Party might have a chance of taking down a weaker Democrat in what is sure to be another low-turnout election.

For the record - I’m not suggesting crossing party lines to try to take out another party. I’m suggesting that lefty voters think about using their vote for someone they can live with if the Democrats win the special election. The most progressive candidates in the Democratic field do not have the clout of the three frontrunners, and will be weaker Democrats on April 7th. (They will probably still win, however.)

Vaguely Related

• Chicago’s 5th District Primary Voting Information - March 3rd
• Is Mike Quigley Ready For the Geico Gecko?

Can I just take a moment to say how important it is for voters to turn out for this primary?

Turnout is expected to be very low - and with Fritchey, Feigenholtz and Quigley set to split the Democratic field, economist Charlie Wheelan or labor lawyer Tom Geoghegan could slip in with enough support.

While the fields are not as large in the Republican and Green Party primaries, every vote will definitely count, whichever ballot you choose.

(Speaking of which, there have been some problems in recent elections with Green Party ballots being ‘unavailable’ or placed out of sight/off the judges’ table. If you’re a Green, make sure to get your proper ballot; they should at all polling places.

And all fair-minded voters should have a check to make sure that their judges are providing equal opportunities to all parties. You can ask even if you’re not taking a Green ballot.)

For the record, I’m supporting Charlie Wheelan. He’s a economics and public policy prof down at U of C. As such, he’s a political outsider in Chicago (yay!), as well as one of the most progressive/lefty Democrats in the field.

If you’re still making up your mind, I suggest having a look at his website. If you’ve already made up your mind, great!

Voting info:

Check your registration, Chicago residents and suburban Cook County residents. If your status is ‘Inactive’ call 312.269.7936 to resolve the issue and be prepared to bring your driver’s license to the polling place.

Polls are open tomorrow, March 3rd, from 6am until 7pm. You must vote at your polling place, not at the early voting sites. Your polling place listed on your voter card or you can check online.

If you are in line at 7pm, you must be allowed to vote. Do not be turned away. If your workday spans the entirety of open polling times, your employer must give you two hours off to vote.

Various Chicago voting nonsense: If you have voted in your polling place before and are in the signature book (a white slip with your signature on the left side) - you are not required to show ID. It’s always a good thing to bring along in case of a canvas challenge, but - as a voter - you are allowed to speak to other voters and to question a judge who asks for ID from a voter in the book with a white slip.

During the 2008 election, my judge insisted on seeing ID and then yelled at me when I refused. We had to call the BoE, but the argument continued, with her loudly abusing me the entire time I voted. It was a miserable experience for me, but I know the law and was helped by good BoE employees.

It may sound like a minor issue, but many lower-income and older residents don’t have IDs (and may not return to vote if turned away by ignorant/poorly trained/corrupt election judges). It is illegal for election judges to require white-slip voters to produce ID. If you see abuse, please bring it (politely) to the attention of the judge. If they respond poorly, stick to your guns and call the BoE. It is your right as a voter. And it’s your vote.

While we’re talking about proper voting procedures - this is the proper order of things at the polling place.

1. Your give your name and your application should be located in the book.
2. You sign your application.
3. It is checked against your signature in the book (white slips).
4. Your application is then removed, exchanged for a ballot, and placed on the spindle.

You should NOT be given your application before your signature is checked. You should NOT have to ‘check in’ with a partisan pollwatcher beforehand. Partisan pollwatchers should NOT be sitting at the table with election judges.

Report any and all irregularities to the Board of Elections (312.269.7870/312-269-7900).

Happy voting!

Vaguely Related

• Go Vote, IL-05!
• Illinois and Chicago Voting Information - General Election 2008

Here’s the direct mail I got today from Mike Quigley, one of the candidates in the Democratic primary to fill the seat of Honorable Vacancy - IL05.

Um, it just me or does Quigley’s ad seem strikingly (some might say ‘actionably’) similar to Geico’s dollar bill ad?

Except for the quality of the image - Quigley’s ad looks like they took photos of Thin Mints and someone got a bit munchy on the Feigenholtz - I’d say Team Quigley is one googly eye away from a lawsuit.

And see, it sucks that now my attention has been drawn to this ad because I really like Mike Quigley - I think he’s more useful on the Cook County Board, but I like him.

But now, I’ve opened up the advert, so now I have to show you the most redonk photo of Blagojevich ever - not surprisingly directly next to Feigenholtz, Fritchey and Todd Stroger.

The man is many things, but he’s not that orange. Incredibly, my camera has actually improved its color and tone - the original provides a greater jack o’lantern effect.

There are also two missing commas in this sentence:

Sara Feigenholtz and John Fritchey voted for Rod Blagojevich’s sales tax hike that [sic] combined with Todd Stroger’s tax hike [sic] made Chicago’s sales tax the HIGHEST IN THE NATION.

(Yes, yes, I know. Who am I to cast the first grammar stone? But, seriously, I proof things I write for money.)

Given all the political circuses as of late, I, for one, am looking forward to the March 3rd primary.

And - provided Geico is not aggressively litigious - to Mike Quigley’s continued excellent work on the Cook County Board. (Sorry, Mike.)

Vaguely Related

• Go Vote, IL-05!
• Will Blagojevich Take Others Down with Him?

You go away for a couple of days and everyone’s all up in your fake-ish Senator demanding explanations about what he did or did not promise to do for your ex-governor.

Jeez, people are pushy! Let’s let the man tell it, shall we?

I mean, can you all imagine what’s going on now, when the secretary of state wouldn’t sign the petition? And we had to try to deal with all that…And (had) to hire all these lawyers. And they were looking at all the law and doing all this research. This is all going on and so we can be prepared to go to court in case they didn’t seat us…So we went out on Jan. 15, and we stayed in Washington because I was sworn in. And guess what? I had to vote that evening. At 4:30 or 5 o’clock, I had to cast my first vote in the Senate.

With all that going on, it would be easy to forget to mention that you’d met with a host of Blagojevich’s fundraisers and tried to raise money for him.

It would be equally easy to imply, under oath, that you’d done no such thing.

It’s clear that Burris’ appointment is a path of least resistance to 2010, when Alexi Giannoulias - currently getting some foreign policy chops with Dick Durbin in Greece - can take over. Madigan gets the statehouse… and scene.

So whilst Harry Reid ‘hope[s Burris] didn’t try to avoid or mislead anyone’, we have renewed sentiment that Burris is unfit for the job, now with editorials calling for his resignation.

God, it’s, like, what’s the point? Illinois can’t afford another special election. And who the hell would even want this albatross of a truncated term? Better to save your pennies and mount a co-Giannoulias challenge to the weakened Burris.

This nonsense made the Kentucky papers today. I sort of thought when I came back to the US people would stop asking me, “Seriously, what is up with your [insert name of political office]?’

So wrong.

Vaguely Related

• Will Blagojevich Take Others Down with Him?
• Roland Burris - Ready to Serve in the Senate

I am a dork because I get excited about pieces of legislation.

The Prevention First Act - introduced in both the US House (H.R.463) and Senate (S.21) - is giddily awesome and covers everything from emergency contraception and comprehensive sex ed to assistance for rape survivors and funds for positive life education.

Things like this are why I heart my Democratic Congress (today):

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any information concerning the use of a contraceptive provided through any federally funded sex education, family life education, abstinence education, comprehensive health education, or character education program shall be medically accurate and shall include health benefits and failure rates relating to the use of such contraceptive.

No more ‘condoms have tiny holes’ if you wants the federal dollars, friends.

Hospitals receiving federal funding would be required to provide free EC to victims of sexual assault as well as providing them with the medically accurate information that EC does not cause abortion.

Also:

Use of Funds- Funds received by an entity as a grant under this section shall be used for programs that–

`(1) replicate or substantially incorporate the elements of one or more teenage pregnancy prevention programs that have been proven (on the basis of rigorous scientific research) to delay sexual intercourse or sexual activity, increase condom or contraceptive use without increasing sexual activity, or reduce teenage pregnancy;
…
`(f) Relation to Abstinence-Only Programs- Funds under this section are not intended for use by abstinence-only education programs…

Which is redundant since abstinence-only programs are not scientifically shown to significantly delay sexual activity (much less to promote safe sexual activity), but I like to see Congress covering its bases.

What else? Ah yes, funding can go to a program that:

(1) is age-appropriate and medically accurate;

(2) does not teach or promote religion;

(3) teaches that abstinence is the only sure way to avoid pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases;

(4) stresses the value of abstinence while not ignoring those young people who have had or are having sexual intercourse;

(5) provides information about the health benefits and side effects of all contraceptives and barrier methods as a means to prevent pregnancy and reduce the risk of contracting sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS;

(6) encourages family communication between parent and child about sexuality;

(7) teaches young people the skills to make responsible decisions about sexuality, including how to avoid unwanted verbal, physical, and sexual advances; and

(8) teaches young people how alcohol and drug use can effect responsible decision making.

States can also receive money for programs that teach positive male sexuality and preventative domestic/partner violence techniques, amongst other things.

I’m pretty much over the moon about these bills (before they are inevitably stripped of everything meaningful).

Have a gander at the House bill and the Senate bill.

If you like what you read, contact your Rep about H.R.463 and your Senators about S.21. Make sure to note that you are a constituent and specifically ask them to support the bill.

I’ve already called Burris and Durbin, though ‘The Honorable Vacancy - IL05‘ was not available. (Click the link; that was the actual output for my query.)

Links:
Louise Slaughter Seeking To Destroy America Through Accurate Sex Education [Jezebel]

Vaguely Related

• Today in Lady News
• Bush Administration Pushes Through New HHS Rule

So deep is my loathing of Cook County Board President Todd Stroger that I read this article thinking, ‘Yep, I’d vote for him. Vote for him. Never heard of him, but I’d vote for him.’

Former Chicago Public School CEO Paul Vallas is considering challenging Stroger as a Republican in 2010.

“I really believe that it’s almost impossible to run as an independent or as a reform candidate through the Democratic Party,” Vallas said. “At the end of the day, if you’re going to be a reform candidate, particularly in Cook County…it becomes more realistic and more practical to run as a Republican.”

Well, it seems as though Vallas could consider a third party or running as an independent, but his point about the Democratic Party in the county is well-taken. He does have the name recognition to run on an alternative ticket, though he may benefit from what little structure there is to the CC Republican Party.

It’ll be freaking (though unfathomably) difficult to beat Stroger in the primary because he’s got money and (unbelievable to the point of making me pull my hair out) support from sectors of the city (notably 8th Ward).

Claypool’s pondering another crack at Stroger in the primary, but he’d just about seal his fate as a guy who can’t win elections if he loses the primary a second time.

Here’s what Stroger (largely mediated through the Tribune) had to say about his potential challengers.

Stroger contended Vallas, whose family still lives in Palos Heights, has been working in New Orleans and “doesn’t know any of the things we have done.” He also accused Claypool of being an obstructionist.

Honey, everyone knows the ‘things [you] have done’; everyone hates them.

Ugh, every time I see/hear from him I just want to scream, ‘Exist somewhere else!’

Though, to be fair, since the Tribune is running a countdown until his primary on their Ed page, it’s hard to know if they’re choosing the cringe-worthiest of the quotes.

I went to a forum last night on reforming corruption in Illinois. It’s difficult to know where to start, I know, but getting some of the cash out of this race - in addition to some serious electoral reform - would be one of the top items on my list.

Vaguely Related

• Will Blagojevich Take Others Down with Him?
• Stroger, the County Tax and the Fine

Throughout the impeachment process, former governor Blagojevich kept hinting that he ‘knew things’ about his colleagues.

There’s no question that there’s plenty of blame (as well as lots of different kinds of blame) to go around in Chicago/Illinois politics.

But I wonder how much of governor Pat Quinn’s promise to ‘fumigate state government’ will be carried out by the state’s ex-governor.

Earlier this week, Blago casually dropped Machine boss (and father-in-law) Dick Mell’s name and the old garbage dump scandal into the same sentence.

And outside his house last night - despite saying he’d only make a statement, he couldn’t help grandstanding and taking some questions from the press - he asked the assembled reporters if they would come back if he had something to say.

Later, claiming that ‘the fix was in’, he casually worked these two sentences into his mixture of ramblings:

I’d like to tell you some of the inside stuff, some of the things they were trying to do, and I’ll talk about that later, if [you in the press are] interested.
…
And as for some of those friends of mine in the state Senate, Dr. King said, that in the end, you remember not the words of your enemies, but the silence of your friends.

Given what Blagojevich has to know - and may possibly mention in a criminal trial/plea bargain - a goodly number of Illinois and Chicago politicians surely broke into a sweat hearing those words.

We’ll have to wait to see if the ex-governor will one up Quinn’s fumigation bomb with a nuclear one.

Vaguely Related

• Liveblogging the Blagojevich Endgame
• Patti Blagojevich Painted as Lady Macbeth

I’m a bit tired of blogging today, so I’m just passing you over to Jezebel, which has a nice photo of the signing and a transcript of Obama’s remarks.

It’s pretty great that this bill was Obama’s first - may there be more lovely moments like this to come.

Vaguely Related

• Today in Lady News
• The Media Introduces Dana Perino!

Wow, US parliamentary procedure is insane. There are multiple senators now escorting the Chief Justice from the chamber. Looks like a pretty solid old man to me; I’m sure he had it.

WAIT - they were crapping on about how much they wanted to get back to work and now they’re on recess until 4pm next Wednesday?

Well, after the hard work of being in session for two weeks, I suppose they need a week off.

Anyway, Rod Blagojevich was just removed from office.

Everyone was all sort of ‘good riddance’, especially Meeks (D-Chgo) who responded “absolutely!” when asked if Blago should be prevented from holding office in IL ever again.

So that’s that. A friend of mine said ‘Congrats, Gov Quinn!”, but I say wait until he’s actually sworn in.

For all we know, Blago’s taken all the state monies and kittens and is absconding to Canada to buy low-cost prescription drugs for old people.

Update: Apparently to combat any shenanigans, they stealth swore in Pat Quinn. He is governor! And only Alexi Giannoulias saw, as Alexi Giannoulias is happy to tell you all over your tvs.

5:27: Jesus, ABC7 reporter Chuck Goudie freaking called Blago as they un-governored him. He switched over from the other line and said, ‘Hey.’

This fact was just reported on my tv.

I imagine the nail in the coffin for Blago was finding Chuck Goudie on his phone at that life-changing moment.

Vaguely Related

• Will Blagojevich Take Others Down with Him?
• Liveblogging the Blagojevich Endgame